Steve Duck’s theory makes complete sense to me! I have seen examples of each type of relationship mentioned in the text. I believe that almost everyone uses pre-interaction cues in the decision to choose a romantic partner; I believe it is almost natural to look at physical attractiveness first and then move on to personality traits. I do not, however, think that physical attractiveness is the primary or most important factor in a romantic partner. I find many things other that physical attractiveness to be important in choosing a partner; I tend to look for a person who has goals, healthy friendships and proactive hobbies. I usually filter people out who have not or do not plan on pursuing a higher education. I have had times when I have judged a person based on their clothing or their appearance just to be proven wrong; I think it is important to get over bias and be open to interacting with others. In doing so, you never know who you will meet-a potential networking acquaintance or your future partner.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Filters
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I feel myself that it is 100% natural to look at physical attractiveness first. It doesn't always have to be about how cute this person is, or how tall that person is, but it can be about the vibe that person gives, or how they are communicating with someone else in your presence. I've been in a situation where at first I thought someone was "ok looking" but once I heard him speak, my knees got weak! HAHA. But filters are essential in establishing and maintaining relationships. I agree with you about being open to interacting with others of different backgrounds and lifestyles, and I think that those with higher education (like us) have an advantage.
ReplyDelete